“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Now, for your class! You have here a provocative study or demonstration in the nature of personality for your club. For my personality is not Ruburt, nor is Ruburt mine. We even have the words of a signed psychologist saying that I am not a secondary personality. I make no attempt to dominate Ruburt’s private life nor, indeed would I expect him to allow it. There are no points of conflict. I do not represent any restrained or any inhibited portions of Ruburt’s own being. As you all know, he is hardly the inhibited type on his own! I have helped him in that his personality operates more effectively. He is able to use his ability more fully. But that it seems so could hardly be psychological crime.

[...] His material was hilarious, provocative, and profound — all at once. [...]

Unless you have questions, I will end the session, and hope you found it provocative.

[...] We talked about this now — without expecting Seth to discuss it — and agreed that she’d have to slack off on such extracurricular adventures, no matter how interesting the “provocation.”

[...] He remembers you telling him not to kiss you or be sexually provocative unless he meant it.

I found your discussions just now provocative and amusing. [...]

[...] Who else did we know, so “old school” who’d even speak of tipping one’s hat, or refer to food as “good cuisine?” Anyway he certainly didn’t sound frightening, and the fifth-dimensional monologue was really provocative.

The harder the ego attempts to hold down the emotions, the more explosively will they show themselves upon the least provocation, and the more the ego will attempt to hold them down, and the worse the ulcer becomes. [...]

(And so 11 years were to pass before Seth began his outright discussion of his very provocative concept of counterparts.)

[...] His theories as to the multidimensional personality are not only intellectually provocative but emotionally challenging. [...]

“You have here [in the session itself] a provocative demonstration of the nature of personality,” he said. [...]

(Later we thought that this last statement had extremely provocative implications for cases in which visions of religious figures are reported. [...]

[...] Such provocative assertions leave behind them unsatisfied voids of curiosity. [...]