“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

The symbols were representations of reality. To alter them through carelessness seemed almost a sacrilege, a betrayal of truth. In that regard you saw yourself as the guardian of truth. Visually you were able to pick up the present version of the Sumari statement. Do you follow me?

You were, as Nebene, extremely stern with your students, concerned that they not fall into carelessness. You were focused upon the transmission of knowledge. In the Denmark life the love of the visual was still with you, but you were trying to allow yourself greater freedom with it, to feel the freedom of adding to what you saw, but you felt a great reluctance to do so. It is for that reason that you gave up painting in that life.

[...] The most careless remark in any situation is not careless. [...]

Even the first had its psychological applications, for the uncle at that time was dissatisfied with existence and with his accomplishments, and the carelessness that helped result in his accident was also partially his own. [...]

[...] Otherwise they would emerge in an overexuberance when relieved from work pressure, resulting in carelessness. [...]

[...] You capture as much as possible and in whatever way you choose, a careless, childlike, playing attitude.

Even the first had its psychological implications, for the uncle at that time was dissatisfied with existence, and with his accomplishments, and the carelessness that helped result in his accident was also partially his own. [...]

[...] But we’ve also grown careless again: She walks but once a day, instead of the twice I suggested recently, and which she agreed to, and which Seth seconded in a recent session. [...]

[...] We see the intimately known windows of the two apartments we shared still vacant, the blinds hanging at careless angles. [...]