1 result for (book:tes9 AND session:431 AND stemmed:unit)

TES9 Session 431 August 26, 1968 10/35 (29%) number row unit shafts behind
– The Early Sessions: Book 9 of The Seth Material
– © 2014 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 431 August 26, 1968 9:19 PM Monday

[... 9 paragraphs ...]

The unit of the numbers alone however signifies their existence. Now, mathematics is not nearly understood within your system. A fourth and fifth-dimensional mathematics cannot be initiated from within inside your own system.

It is as if each number represents not only the number itself, not only a unit to be added, subtracted, multiplied or divided, but also as if each number had infinite varieties of intensities that you do not perceive. I am not talking of smaller units within that number, but of the nature of the unit itself.

These multidimensional intensities would be considered as inherent qualities belonging to each number. (One minute pause.) They would represent other dimensional realities inherent in the number itself, and since numbers are only symbols they would therefore represent other dimensional realities inherent in the unit for which the number stood.

As one number quite simply can be added to another without denying the validity of either number, nor the individuality of either number, so a different kind of grouping also takes place (pause), involving (pause), mathematical manipulations of these other intensities that reside within the number units.

(Pause. Very slow delivery.) In no way does this alter the individual character of any unit number. Since we are involved in this discussion I will give you a simple analogy, and please understand that it is an analogy, meant only to simplify the idea.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

They are all however variations, but neither one is patterned upon any other. Each number in our original quote “row” that you see has therefore within it these other individual units.

Behind 1 then imagine the infinite other 1’s, literally for the analogy’s sake one behind the other. Now this long line of 1’s may seem to stretch out indefinitely (Jane spread her arms wide), or may seem (Jane clapped her hands together) to snap together into one. There is expansion and contraction within this simple number 1 then, within any number or unit.

This sort of expansion and contraction has nothing to do with addition or subtraction, multiplication or division; but it is an inherent quality of all units.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

In the same manner any of the unit intensities behind each number may change position while still remaining itself, and retaining its individuality as a unit. If you use x and y rather than 1 and 2, basically the same is true. Now this analogy applies to identity. You are in a world where you see one particular intensity unit—belonging say to number 1.

You do not perceive the other intensity units to which it belongs. You perceive—in other terms—the 1, say, as a flat line on a flat surface, and are unable to imagine the existence (pause), the intensity, within that simple unit number.

[... 13 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES5 Session 219 January 3, 1966 Lorraine Bunn test box Mansfield
TES6 Session 252 April 20, 1966 sculpture bronze Bill column Macdonnel
TES6 Session 265 June 6, 1966 Marilyn ceramic bricks Wilburs object
UR2 Section 6: Session 740 February 26, 1975 infinities infinite Millers Corio finite