1 result for (session:506 AND stemmed:unit)

TES9 Session 506 October 27, 1969 17/55 (31%) units polarity poles observatories ee

[... 9 paragraphs ...]

The units (electromagnetic) about which I have been speaking do not have any specific, regular, preordained “life,” in quotes. They will not seem to follow many scientific principles. Since they are the intuitive force just beyond the reach of matter, upon which matter is formed, they will not follow the laws of matter, although at times they will mimic the laws of matter.

It is almost impossible to detect an individual unit, for in its dance of activity it constantly becomes a part of other such units, expanding and contracting, pulsating and changing in intensity, in force, and changing polarity. This last is extremely important.

(Pause, one of many.) With Ruburt’s limited vocabulary, this is rather difficult to explain, but it would be as if the positions of your north and south poles changed constantly while maintaining the same relative distance from each other, and by their change in polarity upsetting the stability (pause) of the planet—except that because of the greater comparative strength (pause) at the poles of the units (gestures, attempts to draw diagrams in the air), a newer stability is almost immediately achieved after each shifting. Is that much clear?

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

The “initial,” in quotes, originating emotional energy that sets any given unit into motion, and forms it, then causes the unit to become a highly charged electromagnetic field, with those characteristics of changing polarities just mentioned.

The changing polarities are also caused by attraction and repulsion from other like units, which may be attached or detached. There is a rhythm that underlies all of this changing polarity and changing intensities that occur constantly. But the rhythms have to do with the nature of emotional energy itself, and not with the laws of physical matter.

Without an understanding of these rhythms the activity of the units would appear haphazard, chaotic, and there would seem to be nothing to hold the units together. Indeed, they seem to be flying apart at tremendous speeds. (Gestures.) The “nucleus,” in quotes—now using a cell analogy—if these units were cells, which they are not, then it would be as if the nucleus were constantly changing position, flying off in all directions, dragging the rest of the cell along with it. Do you follow the analogy?

[... 1 paragraph ...]

The units obviously are within the reality of all cells. Now. (Pause.) The initiation point is the basic part of the unit, as the nucleus is the important part of the cell. The initiating point is the originating, unique, individual and specific emotional energy, or EE (pause), that forms any given unit. It becomes the entryway into physical matter.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

(Pause.) The energy point, the EE point, from here on, constantly changes the form of the unit, but the procedure I have just mentioned must first occur. The unit may become circular, for example. Now these intensities of EE, forming the units, end up by transforming all available space into what they are. Certain intensities and certain positions of polarity between and among the units, and great groupings of the units, compress energy into solid form.

The emotional energy within the units is obviously the motivating factor, and you can see then why emotional energy can indeed shatter a physical object. You may take your break.

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

(Jane made it a point to mention that in regard to the switch in polarities of the ELM units: “This isn’t only with north and south switching, but opposites anywhere on the rim of the circle I used as illustration—such as east and west reversed, etc.”

[... 1 paragraph ...]

Now. The intensity of the original emotional energy controls the activity, the strength, the stability, and the relative size of the unit; the rate of its pulsation, and its power to attract and repel other units, and its ability to combine with other units. Now the behavior of these units changes in the following manner. *(Pause.) *When a unit is in the act of combining with another unit, it aligns its components in a characteristic way. When it is separating itself from other units it will align its components in a different way. The polarities change in each case within the unit itself.

It will alter it polarities within itself, adopting the polarity-design of the unit to which it is being attracted, and will change its polarity away from that design upon breaking contact.

Take for example five thousand such units, aligned together, formed together. They would still of course be invisible. But if you could view them each individual unit would have its poles lined up in the same manner. It would look like one single unit—say it is of circular form—so it would appear like a small globe, with the poles lined up as in your earth.

If this large unit were then attracted to another larger unit, circular, with the poles running east and west in your terms, then the first unit would change its own, and all of the units within it would do the same. (Pause.)

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

Now these units may also gain so in intensity and strength that they form relatively (underlined) permanent structures within your system, because of the astonishing energy behind them. Your Stockridge...

[... 8 paragraphs ...]

The units so charged with intensive emotional energy, formed patterns for matter that retained their strength. Now these units, while appearing within your system, may also have another reality outside of it, propelling the emotional energy units through the world of matter entirely.

(Pause.) The energy units, as I told you, are relatively indestructible. They can however lose or gain power, fall back into intensities beneath matter, or go through matter, appearing as matter as they do so, and projecting through your system. We will deal with that portion of their activity separately. In such cases however they are in a point of transition obviously, and in a state of becoming. Now you may take a break or end the session as you prefer.

[... 8 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES3 Session 114 December 14, 1964 units particles interrelationship systems 110th
TES9 Session 431 August 26, 1968 number unit row intensities shafts
DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 890, December 19, 1979 units ee sperm awareized fields
UR1 Section 1: Session 682 February 13, 1974 units probable unpredictability ee 581st
DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 889, December 17, 1979 units cu wave particles operate