1 result for (heading:"98 octob 19 1964" AND stemmed:arthrit)

TES3 Session 98 October 19, 1964 4/63 (6%) nodule arthritic wrist irritation injury
– The Early Sessions: Book 3 of The Seth Material
– © 2013 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 98 October 19, 1964 9 PM Monday as Scheduled

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

(Earlier today, feeling somewhat tense, Jane had visited a chiropractor for treatment. While talking with him she mentioned a hard lump that had appeared recently on the inside of her left wrist. It bothered her but little; the doctor stated that it could be an arthritic nodule; seeing that this upset her greatly, he reassured her by saying that it was more likely to be the result of an injury. Not remembering any injurious incidents, Jane came home quite upset.

[... 23 paragraphs ...]

The formation on the wrist is not arthritic. You may repeat the statement for him to read. I have told him that he will not develop arthritis.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

I would state furthermore that indeed Ruburt did have occasion to be angry at the chiropractor, since with an emotional fear unthinking suggestions such as his, made with only the flimsiest of evidence, can be most harmful and destructive. And in an unwary, emotionally upset personality, particularly if under stress, such a suggestion could cause a harmless and protective nodule to be changed by the strong powers of adverse expectation, or rather expectation poorly used, into the form of what is feared; as a slight but harmless irregularity of heartbeat, with the unthinking suggestion of a doctor, can become through the patient’s fears an actual functional disorder, so could suggestion turn a relatively harmless formation like Ruburt’s into an arthritic condition.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

Nevertheless, because the patient is in a condition where he is most susceptible to suggestions, a great responsibility lies upon the shoulders of those who would treat illness. The chiropractor’s suggestion that the irritation was an arthritic one was made positively; that is, without thinking he stated “Oh yes, that is not normal at all, it is an arthritic nodule.” Later, realizing that the suggestion had been a poor one, and moreover one of which he was not certain, he amended the statement, adding that such a formation could also be the result of injury or simple irritation to the joint.

[... 26 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES3 Session 99 October 21, 1964 cellar vessel Tubbs furnace collaborate
TES3 Session 106 November 11, 1964 Kiley Nan Playboy November doctor
TPS7 Deleted Session October 28, 1983 motion head bet torso groaned
WTH Part One: Chapter 5: April 18, 1984 diseases bedridden tape vein coping