1 result for (heading:"794 februari 21 1977" AND stemmed:doubl)

NotP Chapter 10: Session 794, February 21, 1977 9/45 (20%) brain orange neural double sequences
– The Nature of the Psyche: Its Human Expression
– © 2011 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Chapter 10: Games That Anybody Can Play. Dreams and the Formation of Events
– Session 794, February 21, 1977 9:31 P.M. Monday

(Early last week a friend sent me a copy of a “double dream” experienced by his lady. Then as Jane and I were discussing the episode last Friday night, I found myself saying that one explanation for double dreams — that is, the awareness of experiencing two dreams at once, or a dream within a dream — could be that each half of the brain has its own separate dream, the two dreams then try to emerge together into ordinary consciousness.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

(As I talked so easily about this, without any conscious foreknowledge or preparation, I realized I’d been mulling over our friend’s letter, and that this was the way my ideas spontaneously came out. I further said that although the two hemispheres of the brain were separate, they were united at the brain stem and by the corpus callosum, and so there were all kinds of interchanges between them. In the same way, in the double dream there would be relationships between the two dreams.

(Later, Jane suggested that I ask Seth to comment upon the ideas in a session. There would also be a number of other reasons for double dreams, of course. I briefly wrote about them in Volume I of “Unknown” Reality; see the notes for Session 692.)

[... 24 paragraphs ...]

Many people are aware of double or triple dreams, when they seem to have two or three simultaneous dreams. Usually upon the point of awakening, such dreams suddenly telescope into one that is predominant, with the others taking subordinate positions, though the dreamer is certain that in the moment before the dreams were equal in intensity. Such dreams are representative of the great creativity of consciousness, and hint of its ability to carry on more than one line of experience at one time without losing track of itself.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

In double dreams and triple dreams consciousness shows its transparent, simultaneous nature. Several lines of dream experience can be encountered at the same time, each complete in itself, but when the dreamer wakes to the fact, the experience cannot be neurologically translated; so one dream usually predominates, with the others more like ghost images.

[... 5 paragraphs ...]

A double dream is like the double life lived by some people who have two families — one in each town — and who seemingly manipulate separate series of events that other people would find most confusing. If the body can only follow certain sequences, still consciousness has inner depths of action that do not show on the surface line of experience. Double dreams are clues to such activity.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

(11:41.) These strands are like double dreams that continue. They also serve as a framework to the recognized self. In periods of stress or challenge the recognized self may sense these other strains of consciousness, and realize that a fuller experience is possible, a greater psychological thickness. On some occasions in the dream state the recognized self may then enlarge its perception enough to take advantage of these other portions of its own identity. Double or triple dreams may represent such encounters at times. Consciousness always seeks the richest, most creative form, while ever maintaining its own integrity. The imagination, playing, the arts and dreaming, allow it to enrich its activities by providing feedback other than that received in the physical environment itself.

This session is dictation for the book — and in answer to your question at the same time. And (humorously) this is an example of a double session. Now if you have no questions —

[... 1 paragraph ...]

— I bid you a doubly fond good evening, and I hope you have some excellent double dreams.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES7 Session 308 December 12, 1966 Gladys jcc Austin memo Nancy
UR1 Section 2: Session 692 April 24, 1974 double barrack simultaneous dream Sue
NoPR Part One: Chapter 5: Session 626, November 8, 1972 involuntary brain Bach deride functions
TES7 Session 312 January 16, 1967 pepper shaker McCormick Baltimore pebbles